【甜心一包養網任鋒】君道再還：錢穆憲制思維中的元首論

The 1946 Political Cooperation and Chamber of Commerce ① Discussed the national law after the war. One of the focus issues that the incumbents and the opposition incitement was the general or internal system. This is a popular political drama that has been performed several times since the early years of the country. The opposition has used the system of advocacy to redeem the increasingly unsettling political human rights, hoping to ensure that the Republican road in the country will not be led to the fork in the road by the latter. The resurrection of the monarchy has become a dream, but will the ghost of the monarchy change its head and control the affairs of the monarchy? This is a dream that enthusiastic republicans refuse to go.

A few years before the convening of politics, the modern Confucian scholar Mo Mu wrote a series of political theory papers, which he collected and published in the name of “Private Politics”. ②The collection is based on the author’s opinion on ChinaThe understanding of political traditions comes to discuss the theory of the five rights and legal principles of Sun Zhongshan, as well as the evaluation of the “Five Five Grasses”③. After the book was completed, Mom Mu gave Liang Shuming, who was preparing to participate in the political meeting, who believed that this book had the intention to make suggestions to the political meeting. However, as the book name and the author’s preface show, Momo established his career in academics, and did not belong to a party, nor did he participate in the political alliance curation group under the position of “no party” (such as Fu Sinian and Guo Moruo). This book is not about political cooperation, but is based on the advice of students put forward by the long-term changes in political traditions. ④

When we come back, since we have carried out theoretical discussions around the Five Rights Law, and other institutional themes such as the system of political system and the way to establish a country, we can still place them in the legal and political verbal structure that evolved from the draft law to the 1946 Chinese Civil Affairs Law and compared them. People in the political situation have fought against the design of the law based on the form of British and American anti-laws and the form of Five-rights. Another modern Confucian scholar, Zhang Junyi, gained widespread praise by “acting the practice of British and American anti-laws in the name of Five-rights and Laws”. Money Muslims are more willing to recognize the inspiration of Chinese political traditions and Five-rights Laws. Can its conspiracy have something to be considered? ⑤For example, in relation to political cooperation, the general system and internal system, the head of state and the international community have no way to raise questions and restrict the domain through political discussion methods like the times? Is there any undesirable way to understand the logic and connotation of the logic of the thinking?

The main problem of the head of state is unknown in the long monarchy tradition of human civilization. In the perspective of modern politics, the assessment obtained by this problem is similar, or even dim. The tide of the people in the sea is vast, why should we pay attention to or even pay attention to this system that seems to be inconsistent with the people in the world? Compared with the archaeology and the jurisprudence of historical science, political research on this phenomenon is extremely incompatible with its actual nature. ⑥ The head of state of modern politics needs to be clear from many perspectives such as political system, character movements and civilization systems. The first article introduces the political arguments raised by the head of state’s question on the Money Muslim, and then focuses on the political thinking logic of the head of state, and combines the principles of “political and civil society” and “monarch-priest-general” to highlight their thinking characteristics. In addition to the structural perspective of the systemic thinking, the dynamic dimension of “character-tradition” that was conceived by the political style was finally introduced, reminding the head of MoMu that he emphasized the basis of the movement of the system, and finally presented the overall outlook of his political thinking logic.

1

The “The Reincarnation of the Head of the Palace” was originally published in “The Oriental Chronicles” in May 1945. This is a year when the world is undergoing a huge change. In the past two months, Rosford died of illness at the fourth americDuring the presidential term, Mussolini was defeated by the gambler and the body was exposed. Hitler ordered Germany to kill himself shortly after his self-destruction. As soon as the article opens, it emphasizes that long-term governance and stability are the prerequisites for the continuous improvement of a country’s political system. The respect and stability of a head of state are the “only condition for determining first” for political stability. Even in the government, we cannot be as good as we follow this law and pray for political peace. ⑦ The establishment of a country cannot be as easy as looking at the head of state, so it is obvious that it is unknown. The problem of Momo Mu is that the monarchy has become an old thing in China and the king cannot be defeated. How should the new head of state be safe? Inclusive message board The “Head of Constitution of the Head of State” revolved around the relationship between the “Five Five Grasses” and the powers of the National People’s Political Consultative Conference and the Five Academy.

The “Five Five Grasses” stipulates that it will be selected by the National Association for registration and exemption, and will be responsible for administrative actual responsibility for the latter. The president has the right to record the president of the administration, judicial and examination department, and the Executive Yuan is responsible to the president. The Legislative Yuan and the Chief Executive Officer are elected by the National People’s Congress, and the Legislative Yuan does not have the right to directly supervise the Executive Yuan. The total term of office is six years and must be held once. The General has the right to urgent orders and the right to split the emergency, and does not stipulate explicit restrictions on its power by legislative institutions. This setting is considered to be a strong general system, suitable for the collective rights needs of the Chinese government in 1930s and 40s. ⑧The twelve draft amendments made by the political agreement in 1946 were to reduce the power of the general and strive to implement internal systems. The External Executive Yuan and the Legislative Yuan established a system relationship, so that the former was responsible to the latter rather than the general, and the general’s administrative rights and personnel appointment and removal rights were greatly contracted and weakened. This orientation achieved a relatively high level of physical development in the 1946 Chinese Civil Affairs Law, promoting a mixed political system of internal and overall systems. ⑨